Awards and citations:


1997: Le Prix du Champagne Lanson Noble Cuvée Award for investigations into Champagne for the Millennium investment scams

2001: Le Prix Champagne Lanson Ivory Award for investdrinks.org

2011: Vindic d'Or MMXI – 'Meilleur blog anti-1855'

2011: Robert M. Parker, Jnr: ‘This blogger...’:

2012: Born Digital Wine Awards: No Pay No Jay – best investigative wine story

2012: International Wine Challenge – Personality of the Year Award




Showing posts with label cork. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cork. Show all posts

Friday, 13 February 2015

#winelover 3rd anniversary: visit Amorim 12th February 2015

 
 Workers@Amorim


Quick post before heading onto Cortes de Cima (Alentejo) and José Maria da Fonseca (Setúbal) today.
 
 On the bus 


 Bright eyed and bushy tailed!

 @Amorim – above and below








 Headed for a corking bath!


Sorting cork

 The new installation



 Magnus Reuterdahl as fashion icon
 

Sunday, 9 February 2014

Cork seats on the Lisbon Metro: are the Portuguese anticipating a cork slump?


Coming in from the airport to the centre of Lisbon this afternoon I got on a new Metro train with cork seats. Are the Portuguese looking to diversify away from cork stoppers anticipating a slump in the market? Although the cork seats were pretty, they were decidedly uncomfortable. I wouldn't want to travel far sitting on one! Transport Cork Authority?

Sunday, 24 July 2011

Vinocamp and its cork sponsors: debate

 Bottle of Chinon Blanc from Baudry-Dutour sealed with a screwcap

Interesting comments from Hervé Lalau on Vinocamp and its cork sponsors here on his Chroniques Vineuses.

Friday, 8 July 2011

Another problem with cork

2008 Casa de Santar, Dão

On the way out to Lisbon I have a brief chat with Fiona Beckett, the Guardian's wine correspondent who was also headed out to Lisbon but not on the same flight. Fiona was on a cork press trip, which doubtless aims to convince those on the trip that cork is the best closure for wine, that the problem of TCA has been solved and that if we don't continue to use cork it will be an ecological disaster as the native lynx, llamas, red squirrels and probably the real Loch Ness monster will be driven to extinction if the cork forests cease to be. I'm sure that Fiona will recognise this clap-trap for what it is.

I arrived in Lisbon in time to pop down to the local supermarket to buy a few things for dinner including of course some wine. Unfortunately when I came to try to open the bottle of 2008 Casa de Santar it was impossible to move the extraordinarily tight cork. Worried that if I tried too hard that I would break the top of the bottle, I started to cut small sections out of the top of the cork until eventually I was able to ease the cork out with a corkscrew.

Although it was worth effort as the 2008 Casa de Santar has very attractive round herbal fruit, it would have been much easier if it had been closed with a screwcap.
Casa de Santar – Dão

See here David Cobbold's polemic against the PR tactics used by the cork industry that he posted on Les 5 du Vin on Monday.


Thursday, 6 January 2011

The cork debate: some thoughts from Luc Charlier

White Chinon from Baudry-Dutour closed with screwcap

'Here are my views on the "environmental" side of the cork issue. I did not try to make a very elegant text (not to be reproduced as such), but the ideas are there.

The « environmental issue ».
First of all, it is very difficult to find adequate data. And, when it is available, it is so biassed by the sponsor of the study that you can question its validity. So, I shall stick to the ideas, not their figures.

“Against” the aluminum: it takes electricity to extract the metal from bauxite. That is true.
Objection: once aluminum is available, it is very easy to recycle. You just don’t recycle cork.

“Pro” oak bark: it keeps local manpower at work and maintains the forest.
Objection: the number of manual workers actually involved in the collection of the bark (once every 8-12 years or so on any individual tree), and the number involved in “keeping the forest tidy” is very small indeed.
Moreover, most places (see Alentejo) where the cork-oak is found are no forests any more. You find the trees in clusters amongst other agricultural activities (wheat for instance).

The transportation issue
The volume (in bulk) for corks and screw-caps is similar, from the manufacturer to the end-user. But cork is heavier (marginally so, I admit).
Aluminum (raw material), when journeying between the production site and the manufacturer, takes very little room indeed. Cork needs a lot of volume, even unprocessed. And the places in the world where it is harvested are scarce and very concentrated (Portugal amongst others).

The air pollution issue
Manual workers invade the places of harvest with diesel vehicles and use combustion engine driven tools in a plenty (mostly two-stroke). By and large, they need to cover a lot of kilometers (from one collection site to the other)

The bark treatment issue
Suffices it to read the producers’ own site and take a look at the steps needed in the manufacturing of final corks: it is water and chemistry (chlorine) from one end to the other.

As a summary: yes, extracting aluminum from its ore demands electricity but recycling decreases this disadvantage. No, cork-oak forest for the purpose of collecting the bark is NOT an activity with sustainable advantages.'

See my recent post on screwcaps here.