Future Economy Barcelona 2012: 0 The Real Economy: 6

'Sold out' but apparently cancelled!

Still a 50% offer available

Only event@Palau de Congressos de Catalunya is 3rd Edition Spa & Beauty Spain October 20-21st 2012

'Only just learnt that the Future Economy event's been cancelled'

I fear those who were looking forward to hearing Al Gore and Juan Verde, the International Co-Chair for the re-election campaign of President Barack Obama, at Pancho Campo's and Charade (aka Chrand) Management's hubristic Future Economy Barcelona 2012 will be disappointed. The conference has been cancelled even though the website claims that the event is sold out.

Juan Verde and Pancho Campo: Is Obama really serious about winning a second term? 

Could it be that Al Gore and Juan Verde have decided that Pancho Campo's history is just too spicy and savoury for prudent politicians? A conviction with prison sentence that still stands in Dubai allied with Campo's relationship to the truth that is as distant as Shetland is to London. 

Although it would be eminently understandable if Gore and Verde decided to put distance between themselves and Campo, this is not the case as they will be speaking at Thinking Green in Gibraltar on Sunday 21st October. Chrand Management are involved in organising Thinking Green. 

Instead the Future Economy Barcelona 2012 event was probably cancelled due to poor ticket sales, despite claims that it was 'sold out'. 

Pancho Campo@the press conference in Gibraltar (19th July 2012)

  

'Present at the press conference (19th July 2012) was Francisco Campo Director of Chrand; the company working with the Government organising the seminar, who was accompanied by Chrand’s Executive Director Paulina Campo and Business Manager Rony Bacqué.'  Read the rest of the report here  

It now appears that Thinking Green is generating controversy:

'Public should be told Al Gore costs, says GSD

GSD spokesman for the Environment, Selwyn Figueras, has called on the Government to publish immediately and with priority the anticipated costs and details of funding for the Thinking Green conference, which is being held next weekend.'  

Read the rest here. 

Also on GBC News: Figueras calls for Thinking Green conference cost details

See here. 

Al Gore is reported to be earning $100,000 for his 45 minute speech and apparently is less than keen to debate with Lord Monckton, a sharp critic of Gore. The Gibraltar Chronicle reports that 'Monckton has been damning of the Thinking Green seminar, which he has described as a “propaganda rally” and dismissed Mr Gore as “a global warming profiteer.” Details here.

Not, I trust, yet another fine mess involving Pancho Campo...  

 *

I look forward to reading the inside story in 'EUROPE’S leading drinks trade publication' composed by its 'editor' detailing how the Future Economy event had to be cancelled because Jim Budd 'harassed Campo's nearest and dearest' along with his business associates. A 'publication' that appears to be happy to regurgitate any farrago of lies from Pancho Campo without making the slightest effort at verification.       

Breaking news: Pancho Campo 'to sue iPhone for defamation and commercial damage' for 'smokin' gun' email

Pancho Campo MW – author of the smokin' gun email sent by iPhone: 4th June 2011, 15.30

 
 

The smokin' gun email: sent by Campo's iPhone 3rd June 2011, 15.30

De: Pancho Campo [mailto:panchocampo@gmail.com]
Enviado el: viernes, 03 de junio de 2011 15:30
Para: adela richer
CC: Irene LLorente; <prensa@vinosdemadrid.es>
Asunto: Re: CATA VINOS DE MADTRID POR JAY MILLER, CONFERENCIA, VISITA A BODEGAS Y CATA DE 8 VINOS ENTRE PANCHO CAMPO MW Y JAY MILLER

Querida Adela,

Esta es una oportunidad única para los vinos de Madrid ya que esta DO no entra en los planes de Parker para que sea visitada ni en 2012 ni 2013. 

Las visitas privadas fuera de agenda, como es esta, se hacen en contadas ocasiones por un precio no inferior a 40,000 euros. El que Jay haya aceptado quedarse 2 días mas por la mitad del precio habitual es un milagro y una oportunidad que Madrid difícilmente volverá a tener.

El miércoles que viene cerraremos nuestra agenda. Ojalá que reconsideren, especialmente considerando lo difícil que esta el mercado para España y que cualquier empujón como este puede ayudarles mucho.

Un beso desde la Toscana.

Pancho

Enviado desde mi iPhone

English translation: 

De: Pancho Campo [mailto:panchocampo@gmail.com]

Enviado el: viernes, 03 de junio de 2011 15:30

Para: adela richer

CC: Irene LLorente; <prensa@vinosdemadrid.es>

Asunto: Re: CATA VINOS DE MADTRID POR JAY MILLER, CONFERENCIA, VISITA A BODEGAS Y CATA DE 8 VINOS ENTRE PANCHO CAMPO MW Y JAY MILLER

Dear Adela,

This is a unique opportunity for vinos de Madrid, seeing as how this DO is not in Parker's plans to be visited in either 2012 or 2013.

Private visits off the set agenda, as this would be, rarely take place, and not for a price below 40,000 euros. The fact that Jay has agreed to stay 2 days more, and for half the usual price, is a miracle and an opportunity that Madrid will find it difficult to have again.

We close our diary next Wednesday. I hope they reconsider, especially considering how difficult the market is for Spain and that any little push like this can help a lot.

A kiss from Tuscany.

Pancho

Sent from my iPhone

**

Jim's Loire understands that Pancho Campo MW has instructed his lawyers – Cata, Schmuck and Magistral in Marbella – to prepare to sue iPhone for defamation, commercial damage to his business and that of The Wine Academy of Spain and upset to his family.

"They told me it was a smartphone. If it was truly a smartphone it would not have let me send that dumb email from Tuscany, which is in very clear breach of Parker's ethical guidelines and makes me look like a mafioso from Marbella. We will be seeking substantial damages for loss of business and the tarnishing of our reputations.' 

**

Campo's threats to sue

Campo or his associates continue to issue threats to second and third parties as well as apparently to his friends on Facebook that he is about to sue me for harassment and defamation. I have been looking at Campo's business affairs since September 2009, I have yet to receive any letter from Campo or one of his solicitors.


On this occasion I'm prepared to offer him some free legal advice on the harassment laws in England and Wales. 

Earlier this year lawyers representing a serial scamster informed me that I was harrassing and invading their client's privacy. This formed part of my response:

'Returning to the Puddick case there are three crucial paragraphs in the Court of Appeal judgment (Iqbal v Dean Manson ) above that supports press freedom:

[33] Prior to the 1997 Act, the freedom with which the press could publish facts or opinions about individuals was circumscribed by the law of defamation. Protection of reputation is a legitimate reason to restrict freedom of expression. Subject to the law of defamation, the press was entitled to publish an article, or series of articles, about an individual, notwithstanding that it could be foreseen that such conduct was likely to cause distress to the subject of the article.

[34] The 1997 Act has not rendered such conduct unlawful. In general, press criticism, even if robust, does not constitute unreasonable conduct and does not fall within the natural meaning of harassment. A pleading, which does no more than allege that the defendant has published a series of articles that have reasonably caused distress to an individual, will be susceptible to a strike-out on the ground that it discloses no arguable case of harassment.


[35] It is common ground between the parties to this appeal, and properly so, that before press publications are capable of constituting harassment, they must be attended by some exceptional circumstance which justifies sanctions and the restriction on the freedom of expression that they involve. It is also common ground that such circumstances will be rare.’

The rest of the post can be read here.  

Campo even a cursory look at the above clauses indicates that an harrassment case based on a series of posts published on Jim's Loire would be a non-starter.