Showing posts with label VTT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label VTT. Show all posts
Sunday, 28 May 2017
Epeigné-les-Bois – Randonnée + Fête Champêtre: 28th May 2017
Today was Epeigné's annual May time annual randonnée
– walk or mountain bike
10 or 17Km walk
25km, 45km, 60km VTT
Bikes arriving and signing on
(above and below)
Thursday, 19 September 2013
An eventful bike ride: Chien 1 Cyclist 0 or what to do in France if bitten by a dog
Yesterday soon after I posted: 'Loire 2013 – certainly going to be a late vintage' – I set off on my mountain bike for a quiet spin through the local vineyards to get an initial idea of how the grapes were looking and to take a few photos. The ride turned out to be considerably more eventful and painful than I anticipated!
Eventful because I got bitten by a dog – a braque – not just a nip but a proper bite with the dog's tooth going well into my right calf. Not sure it was a Braque de Weimar but it certainly looked like this and was certainly a powerful brute.
It happened around 5pm in the 'badlands!' of Saint-Georges-sur-Cher I had cut down through the vines to the east of Château les Coudraies and joined a small road heading east. I passed an elderly man sitting by a small bridge over a stream. Almost immediately two barking dogs, one a braque and one a much smaller breed, ran out from the wood close to where the man was sitting. I slowed down to avoid colliding with the dogs and then accelerated to try to get away from them. The powerful braque was on my right side snarling and snapping. It kept up with me as I accelerated up the hill and sank its teeth into my right calf with one tooth going in quite deeply. The other dog chased on my left hand side but made no attempt to bite.
It happened around 5pm in the 'badlands!' of Saint-Georges-sur-Cher I had cut down through the vines to the east of Château les Coudraies and joined a small road heading east. I passed an elderly man sitting by a small bridge over a stream. Almost immediately two barking dogs, one a braque and one a much smaller breed, ran out from the wood close to where the man was sitting. I slowed down to avoid colliding with the dogs and then accelerated to try to get away from them. The powerful braque was on my right side snarling and snapping. It kept up with me as I accelerated up the hill and sank its teeth into my right calf with one tooth going in quite deeply. The other dog chased on my left hand side but made no attempt to bite.
I continued riding and managed to distance the dogs. However, as it was clear that the braque had inflicted a substantial bite, I stopped and walked back with the bike to the bridge to ascertain if the man was the dog's owner. As I walked back the braque continued to try to bite me: managing one small nip as I used the bike as a shield. Regrettably I rather forgot my journalistic instincts as I ought to have taken an immediate photo of the bites.
The man explained that the dog belonged to his son, who had been on holiday in Morocco, and was returning that evening. He was a retired doctor, who lived in the house very close to the bridge. He offered to disinfect my wounds and bandage them up, which, given the state of the bites I happily accepted.
In France new laws on dangerous dogs were passed in 2008. The owner of any dog that bites someone has to take the dog to the vet within 24 hours of the incident and then has to make two further visits to the vet. Not only will the dog's health be checked but its 'dangerosité' will be assessed.
This morning, kindly accompanied by Michel Mergot, the maire of Epeigné-les-Bois, I went back to see the owner of the dog, who had now returned from his holiday in Morocco. I wanted to insist that he took his dog to the vet, as the next time it could be a small child on a bike who gets attacked. The dog's owner lives in the north of France, so he has arranged to take his dog to a vet in his home town.
The man explained that the dog belonged to his son, who had been on holiday in Morocco, and was returning that evening. He was a retired doctor, who lived in the house very close to the bridge. He offered to disinfect my wounds and bandage them up, which, given the state of the bites I happily accepted.
The dressing over the bites taken nearly 24 hours after it happened
An hour or so later I headed down to the chemist and the doctors' surgery in Saint-Georges-sur-Cher, where I was seen amazingly quickly by Docteur Yannick Legeay, who redressed my wounds, prescribed antibiotics and organised a tetanus jab. Dr Legeay turned out to be a keen amateur du vin. He also alerted me to the strict laws in France regarding dog bites – see below. I was equally impressed by the Pharmacie-des-Vignes, which is part of the same complex at the eastern end of Saint-Georges-sur-Cher. Unfortunately the bite has also proved to be painful to my pocket running up bills of 74.71€ to the doctor and the chemist, although I will be able to claim this back.
This morning, kindly accompanied by Michel Mergot, the maire of Epeigné-les-Bois, I went back to see the owner of the dog, who had now returned from his holiday in Morocco. I wanted to insist that he took his dog to the vet, as the next time it could be a small child on a bike who gets attacked. The dog's owner lives in the north of France, so he has arranged to take his dog to a vet in his home town.
Useful explanation of the French law on dog bites from www.santevet.com:
(http://www.santevet.com/articles/560-mon-chien-a-mordu-quelqu-un-que-dois-je-faire)
Lorsqu’un chien, quelle que soit sa race, a
mordu une personne, il doit obligatoirement subir une surveillance sanitaire de
quinze jours. Et depuis juin 2008, toute morsure doit être déclarée et le chien
doit subir une évaluation comportementale.
Lorsqu’un chien mord une personne, il doit subir une surveillance
sanitaire de 15 jours. Celle-ci est obligatoire, en prévention de la rage, que
le chien soit ou non vacciné. Cette surveillance se passe en trois temps
:
-une visite chez le vétérinaire dans les 24 heures suivant la morsure
-7 jours après la morsure
-puis 15 jours après la morsure.
Trois visites chez le vétérinaire
Le vétérinaire contrôle l’état de santé de chien et remet à son propriétaire à chaque fois trois exemplaires du certificat de surveillance.
L’un est destiné au maître, le second à la personne qui été mordue et le troisième à la compagnie d’assurance.
-une visite chez le vétérinaire dans les 24 heures suivant la morsure
-7 jours après la morsure
-puis 15 jours après la morsure.
Trois visites chez le vétérinaire
Le vétérinaire contrôle l’état de santé de chien et remet à son propriétaire à chaque fois trois exemplaires du certificat de surveillance.
L’un est destiné au maître, le second à la personne qui été mordue et le troisième à la compagnie d’assurance.
Depuis juin 2008 : de nouvelles obligations
Depuis juin 2008, tout chien ayant mordu une personne doit subir une évaluation comportementale et sa morsure doit être déclarée auprès de la mairie du lieu de résidence.
Le vétérinaire devra également déclarer cette morsure au maire et au Fichier National Canin.
De plus, le chien mordeur devra subir une évaluation comportementale. Elle sera effectuée chez un vétérinaire inscrit sur les listes départementales et devra intervenir avant la fin des quinze jours de mise sous surveillance sanitaire.
A l’issu de cette évaluation, le chien sera classé sur une échelle allant de 1 à 4, ce qui correspond à un degré de dangerosité quasi nul à un degré élevé :
Depuis juin 2008, tout chien ayant mordu une personne doit subir une évaluation comportementale et sa morsure doit être déclarée auprès de la mairie du lieu de résidence.
Le vétérinaire devra également déclarer cette morsure au maire et au Fichier National Canin.
De plus, le chien mordeur devra subir une évaluation comportementale. Elle sera effectuée chez un vétérinaire inscrit sur les listes départementales et devra intervenir avant la fin des quinze jours de mise sous surveillance sanitaire.
A l’issu de cette évaluation, le chien sera classé sur une échelle allant de 1 à 4, ce qui correspond à un degré de dangerosité quasi nul à un degré élevé :
Niveau 1 : pas de risque particulier de
dangerosité en dehors de ceux inhérents à l'espèce canine.
Niveau 2 : risque de dangerosité faible
pour certaines personnes ou dans certaines situations.
Niveau 3 : risque de dangerosité critique
pour certaines personnes ou dans certaines situations.
Niveau 4 : risque de dangerosité élevé pour
certaines personnes.
Le vétérinaire est amené à conseiller le maître en fonction du ‘’classement’’ de son chien et lui indiquer des mesures préventives à mettre en place. Une nouvelle évaluation pourra être décidée par le vétérinaire qui précisera le délai compris entre un à trois ans :
- Si le chien est classé au niveau 2, elle sera renouvelée dans un délai maximum de trois ans ;
- Si le chien est classé niveau 3, elle sera renouvelée dans un délai maximum de deux ans ;
- Si le chien est classé en niveau 4, elle sera renouvelée dans un délai maximum de un an.
Le résultat de l’évaluation sera transmis à la mairie qui pourra décider de diverses mesures en fonction du niveau du chien, notamment de la remise du permis de détention obligatoire depuis le 1er janvier 2010.
Grapes in a vineyard above Les Coudraies. Not sure if this is Gamay or Côt
The leaves should give a clue
Despite the bite I did manage to take a few photos in the Saint-Georges vineyards. Although the Sauvignon is ripening it is obviously not yet ready to pick.
Monday, 8 April 2013
Sancerre – exploring the vineyards en VTT
Scott in the vines above Chavignol (above and below)
Lower slopes of Les Monts Damnés
This morning rode over some of the many tracks in Sancerre, which makes this an excellent place for mountain biking, although some of the paths going up the slopes are very steep. As in Touraine March and April has been very cold. Although we are now over a quarter the way through April, the vines are well of budbreak. The buds are more reminiscent of February or early March. Unless there is a blast of hot weather bud break won't be until towards the end of April with the flowering in late June.
According to Bientôt Rumeur, director of the Bureau Interglaciale Vins du Centre (BIVC): "We anticipate in 2013 that le ban des vendanges in Sancerre and Pouilly will not be until mid-November. It will be a little earlier in Quincy and Reuilly – probably early November!"
8th April: Buds still tight closed more February than April
Looking down on Chavignol from the east (above and below)
Clos de la Poussie, Bué:
Brown areas of Clos de la Poussie presumably awaiting replanting after
the severe erosion problem has been fixed (above and below)
Clos de la Poussie: a parcel severely affected by erosion
Good to see that measures are presumably now being taken to resolved the problem.
To be fair the vineyard is extremely steep here
One of the ravines
A maison des vignes being renovated with a distant view of Sancerre through the cold mist
Vines on the caillottes (limestone) with Sancerre behind
Caillottes: almost no soil for the vines (above and below)
Cold work in the vineyard replacing posts
Landslide on high road into Amigny caused by the heavy rain at the end of last year.
Closed to traffic of course. (Above and below)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












































